WHY I THINK THE EARTH IS FLAT

NOTICE: This article is not necessary a plot to change your believes about the shape of the earth, it is to revolutionize your thinking and cause you to question everything you have been taught, including those you take for universal facts.

That said.....

As a young child, we all thought the earth was flat and the sun and moon revolves round us, it took some breakthrough of some scientists to attests that we were wrong and in fact the earth revolves round the sun....


What if they were wrong all these while? What if all these solar system, galaxies are all a fairy tale? What if believing in a super-gigantic sun is a plan to believe less in a supreme God? I'm not going to talk about the history of NASA and how it's founder was a suspiciously a Satanist, no this is not what this post is all about. Personally I will always question everything I know and have been taught. I challenge everything. You might begin to wonder what makes me think the earth is not globe? You might claim it has been proven that it is in fact a globe but I'll tell you why I think it's flat.

The horizon is perfectly horizontal. Its straight and I don't see any curve on it except for the ones released by NASA, in case you don't know NASA uses a bird eye camera again no matter how high you go, the horizon is always at eye level. If it were a curve, as you gain a higher altitude, you might have to tilt your camera downwards, looking further to see. This never happens which strongly attests that the earth might be an endless flat plane.

planes don't adjust it's nose to the curvature

Hey what about planes? How come they don't bother dipping the noses of the airplanes when they travel from a region on the equator to a region near the north pole? They usually travel in a straight line, if the earth was a globe, they would have found themselves at 80 000 feet in just half an hour and soon it would be floating around in "outer space".

When you pour water into a bowl, it takes the shape of the container but the surface of the water remains totally flat, no matter the shape of the surface beneath, there is no way the surface of water can curve, it has never happened and it will never happen, so then can water curve all up in a globe. Miraculous! lol! If earth was curved and spinning there would be massive water chaos. If earth was indeed an extended flat surface, it perfectly proves the fundamental physical property of fluids fluids finding and remaining level is consistent with experience and common sense.

The Crepuscular rays of the sun. When you look at the sun rays, and trace it's angles, it validates the fact that it is much closer than 93 million miles we were taught. If the sun rays were really coming from as far as 93 million miles away, all the rays will come from a specific and angle and direction. Following the rays of the sun, the sun would be seen shooting out from above the clouds. The crepuscular rays when traced and by solving the maths(Pythagoras theorem) reveals a much smaller sun which is only about  3,391,200 miles. Look at the picture deeply, most of the images are well magnified so you can make your observations and assumptions. Those rays seem to be converging at some point but definitely NOT 93 millions miles away!

the crepuscular attests to a much closer sun

It is claimed the earth moves due East at about 1039mph, having that in mind, then why should a pilot of a helicopter bother moving from West? Shouldn't they just hover up to the sky and wait for their destination to meet them? Scientists claim the atmosphere probably moves along with the earth at 1039mph, if that is so, helicopters or airplanes will have to move much faster to beat the 1039mph speed of the earth, airplanes or helicopters moving due East(opposite the direction of the earth) should in fact reach their destinations much faster, because their destination should be moving closer to them. If also the Earth is rotating at about 1039mph Eastwards, why don't North/South bound pilots have to set diagonal courses to compensate?

Some attempts to prove the earth is a spinning globe have often failed, the experiment that is never taught in schools, called "Airy's failure" carried out by Bradley Airy in 1759, was an experiment to try to prove the earth was moving while the stars were stationary turned out to be a total failure...watch the video below...


Another experiment known as the "Michelson-Morley and Sagnac experiments" performed in 1883 by Albert A. Michelson and Edward W. Morley attempted to measure the change in speed of light due to to Earth's assumed motion in space, it was also as expected a complete failure. They attempted to to measure the change in speed of light due to the assumed motion of the earth through space, they measured in every different direction in various places on the Earth's surface and failed to detect any significant change whatsoever. In order to save the dying heliocentric theory, Albert Einstein's "Special theory of relativity" in 1905 was widely accepted which suites their heliocentric theory(the believe that the sun is the centre of the solar system), which philosophically banished the aether(firmament). Watch the video below to get a clearer view. The irony of it all is that Einstein himself admitted geocentricism(the believe that the sun and moon revolves round the earth) is equally justifiable!!

Albert Einstein

"The struggle, so violent in the early days of science, between the views of Ptolemy and Copernicus would then be quite meaningless. Either coordinate system could be used with equal justification. The two sentences, 'the sun is at rest and the earth moves,' or 'the sun moves and the earth is at rest,' would simply mean two different conventions concerning two different coordinate systems." -Albert Einstein















Yes, gravity. strong enough to hold oceans on a ball but unable to hold down a feather, would it wrong to say everything on this earth is arranged by density and mass? People read about how Isaac Newton figured out gravity when an apple fell from a tree but let's think about it this way, don't you think the apple fell simply because it is heavier than the surrounding air? If you feel a balloon with helium which is less dense than air, it'll go up to the sky, if you feel it up with hydrogen gas which is lighter than helium, it will even move up faster. Wilbur Voliva, a famous flat-Earther in the early 20th century, gave lectures all over America against Newtonian astronomy. He would begin by walking on stage with a book, a balloon, a feather and a brick, and ask the audience: “How is it that a law of gravitation can pull up a toy balloon and cannot put up a brick? I throw up this book. Why doesn’t it go on up? That book went up as far as the force behind it forced it and it fell because it was heavier than the air and that is the only reason. I cut the string of a toy balloon. It rises, gets to a certain height and then it begins to settle. I take this brick and a feather. I blow the feather. Yonder it goes. Finally, it begins to settle and comes down. This brick goes up as far as the force forces it and then it comes down because it is heavier than the air. That is all.”

Read what another scientist, David Wardlaw Scott had to say; “Any object which is heavier than the air, and which is unsupported, has a natural tendency to fall by its own weight. Newton's famous apple at Woolsthorpe, or any other apple when ripe, loses hold of its stalk, and, being heavier than the air, drops as a matter of necessity, to the ground, totally irrespective of any attraction of the Earth. For, if such attraction existed, why does not the Earth attract the rising smoke which is not nearly so heavy as the apple? The answer is simple - because the smoke is lighter than the air, and, therefore, does not fall but ascends. Gravitation is only a subterfuge, employed by Newton in his attempt to prove that the Earth revolves round the Sun, and the quicker it is relegated to the tomb of all the Capulets, the better will it be for all classes of society.”


Also take a deep look at this picture below...

The fact remains that there's no concrete proof that the earth is in motion. We also don't feel it moving, we only see the sun, moon, stars move, we were only taught otherwise and we believed it without questioning simply because it's "scientist fact" without ever realizing that attempts to challenge this heliocentric theory have been by far subdued, google 'proof the earth is flat', and you get a results of the earth not being flat, the experiment named "Airy's failure" is never taught in universities simply because it out-rightly proved the earth was in fact stationary and the stars move instead.

The following scriptures in the Bible claims the earth is an immobile plane...
1 Chronicles 16:30: “He has fixed the earth firm, immovable.”
Psalm 93:1: “Thou hast fixed the earth immovable and firm ...”
Psalm 96:10: “He has fixed the earth firm, immovable ...”
Psalm 104:5: “Thou didst fix the earth on its foundation so that it never can be shaken.”
Isaiah 45:18: “...who made the earth and fashioned it, and himself fixed it fast...”

The Bible order of creation totally negates the Big Bang theory and the gigantic sun.

The Genesis creation story provides the first key to the Hebrew cosmology. The order of creation makes no sense from a conventional perspective but is perfectly logical from a flat-earth viewpoint. The earth was created on the first day, and it was “without form and void (Genesis 1:2).” On the second day, a vault the “firmament” of the King James version was created to divide the waters, some being above and some below the vault. Only on the fourth day were the sun, moon, and stars created, and they were placed “in” (not “above”) the vault.

So if you believe the Bible and also believe in this Big Bang theory, which side are you really on? How can you believe in a sun that was created on the fourth day and also believe in a sun that was formed out of no where before the earth?

Bible description of Earth

Some ancient Egyptians (3,100 B.C.E. to 332 B.C.E) believed in a flat Earth as well, scholars have said.

Historians suggest that the long-lived civilization believed the planet was square-shaped with four corners and an underworld below. The Babylonians also had similar views about a flat, enclosed Earth.

Other ancient cultures in the Americas, China and India also likely held the belief that the Earth was flat

Ancient mythology believed the feminine figure births the sun daily while she embodies the stars

I'll say again, I'm not trying hard to convince you, though I have a very strong feeling we live on an endless flat plane but what I'm really about is for you to question everything. For example, in 240 B.C, Eratosthenes calculated the circumference of the earth by measuring the sun's elevation at noon on the same day in Alexandria, his method of measuring was using a scale drawing of that triangle that was formed from the shadow casted and the vertical rod, this turned out to be 1/50th of a circle. Taking the earth as spherical, and knowing both the distance and direction of Syrene, he concluded that the earth's circumference was 50 times that distance and also postulated that the sun was approximatly 93million miles away from us, the irony of this all is if we take the distance of the sun to be 3million miles away from a flat plane earth, we would also get the same shadow casts as Eratosthenes observed!

So you see, this is science, geocentrics could be wrong while heliocentrics could be wrong and both could also be incredibly wrong, but trying as much as possible to subdue and shy away from some proves is totally unscientific if not occultic, why are these people trying to make us believe in a magnificent sun, why also did the Catholics change the Sabbath day to Sunday when it is commanded in the Bible to always observe the Sabbath day? That's not what this post is all about though...but.....

When science is never challenged or questioned, it becomes nothing but a mere religion.